Ashton Bradford: Landscapes of the sacred 2

 During my reading of this book for class, I stumbled upon an interesting idea. I have always known that different locales meant different things to different people, but was interested in reading about how cultures can mask these areas. This further develops Buber's I and thou quote, as the areas what the people make them to be. Death valley was an example used in the book, where the spanish referred to it as the palm of God. Why are some of these areas called and view as different things to different people?

Different people views places differently because each place holds a certain level of importance and experience to each person. You may see a teddy bear but a child may see a friend that looks back at them. That same concept works with the ideas of areas, for example, a Burger King may be a very important place where somebody grew up eating from, but to another person it may be a run down piece of garbage that has slow service. One person maybe call it BK's, while another  person calls it literal trash. That's just an example, but shows that different places have different meanings and values to different people. The various meanings makes each place more interesting, and can maybe give more people insight into the meaning of places that they may have not valued before.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kayla Hammond- Christmas Saves The Year (student choice)

Kayla Hammond - Prayer as the Posture of the Decentered Self (Phenomenology Reading 2)

Kip Redick Introduction